Weather Alert Block


Wed, 03/11/2020 - 4:56pm -- szb5706

Penn State has extended the remote-delivery period for all classes through at least the spring semester. Visit to learn more. CORONAVIRUS UPDATES: Visit for the latest from Penn State about the global coronavirus outbreak, and to learn more about current travel restrictions for students, faculty, and staff. For information specific to the Penn State Law community, visit

Penn State
Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA
twitter   facebook   linkedin   Instagram   webmail
Give Now Apply Now

Robert Frieden


Professor and Pioneers Chair in Telecommunication and Affiliate Law Faculty

Curriculum Vitae
SSRN Profile

(814) 863-7996
J.D., University of Virginia
B.A., University of Pennsylvania (with distinction)

Rob Frieden holds the Pioneers Chair in Telecommunications and Law at Penn State University. He is a leading analyst in the field of telecommunications and Internet infrastructure and has authored many comprehensive works on international telecommunications, Internet law and policy, cable television, and communications law. Professor Frieden has published over 100 journal articles and four books on various telecommunications topics.

Prior to joining Penn State, Professor Frieden served as Deputy Director, International Relations, Motorola Satellite Communications, Inc., where he managed the regulatory and international liaison efforts for Motorola’s IRIDIUM low earth orbiting satellite project. He has held senior level policy making positions in government and worked in the private sector as an attorney. Professor Frieden received a B.A. in Telecommunications from the University of Pennsylvania and a J.D. from the University of Virginia.

Conflict in the Network of Networks: How Internet Service Providers Have Shifted From Partners to Adversaries, Communications & Entertainment Law Journal (in production);

Network Neutrality and Consumer Demand for “Better Than Best Efforts” Traffic Management, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, & Entertainment Law Journal (in production);

Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Approaches to Network Neutrality: A Comparative Assessment, 30 Berkeley Technology Law Journal, No. 2, 1562-1612 (2015);

Déjà vu All Over Again: Questions and a Few Suggestions on How the FCC Can Lawfully Regulate Internet Access, 67 Federal Communications Law Journal, No. 3, 325-376 (2015);

What’s New in the Network Neutrality Debate, 2015 Michigan State Law Review 739-786;

What’s New in Internet Protocol Television and the Challenge of “Mission Critical” Bits, 33 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, No. 1, 47-87 (2015).      

The Costs and Benefits of Regulatory Intervention in Internet  Disputes: Lessons from Broadcast Signal Retransmission Consent Negotiations 37 Communications & Entertainment Law Journal, No.  1, 1-36 (Winter, 2015)

New models and conflicts in the interconnection and delivery of Internet- mediated content, 38 Telecommunications Policy, No. 11, 970-978  (Dec. 2014);

The Impact of Next Generation Television on Consumers and the First  Amendment, 24 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, & Entertainment Law Journal, No. 1, 61-95 (2014); and

The Rise of Quasi-Common Carriers and Conduit Convergence, 9 I/S: A Journal of Law and Polcy for the Information Society, No. 3, 471-496 (2014).

Legislative and Regulatory Strategies for Providing Consumer Safeguards in a Convergent Information and Communications Marketplace, 33 Hastings Comm. & Entertainment L. J. 207 (2011)

Winning the Silicon Sweepstakes: Can the United States Compete in Global Telecommunications? (Yale University Press, 2010)

Case Studies in Abandoned Empiricism and the Lack of Peer Review at the Federal Communications Commission, 8 J. Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 277 (2009)

The Way Forward for Wireless, in And Communications for All — a Policy Agenda for a New Administration (Amit M. Schejter, ed.) (Lexington Books 2009)

Network Neutrality and Its Potential Impact on Digital Content Platforms, in The Economics of Digital Markets (Gary Madden and Russel Cooper, eds.) (Edward Elgar Publishing 2009)

Balancing Equity and Efficiency in Global Spectrum Management, in Governing Global Electronic Networks — International Perspectives on Policy and Power (William J. Drake & Ernest J. Wilson III, eds.)  (MIT Press 2008)

Institutional Framework and Competitiveness of the U.S. Telecommunications Market, in Competitiveness of New Industries — Institutional Framework and Learning in Information Technology in Japan, the U.S and Germany (Cornelia Storz & Andreas Moerke, eds.) (Routledge 2007)